Projekty Martin Hlavnička

Quality services

Quick completion of construction projects in good quality and reasonable price

Very likeable gentleman, who met with me at the first opportunity and we said what and how. I told him my idea, he was my own and we put our heads together. Nice, lightning approach and even faster result, it should be noted that good quality. I recommend.

I can only recommend Mr. Hlavnicka. Very helpful, helpful and above all has a lot of ideas and can even advise how it could be better designed and make a better solution to our housing. It was also cheaper than other designers, but it did not affect the work. It was very precise and we were very satisfied.

Very professional and nice approach for a very decent price. This is nowhere to be seen. Mr. Hlavnicka is a very pleasant and intelligent person with interesting ideas, does not impose, persuade, just point out that in his opinion it would be better / more advantageous and that. Really helpful, as soon as the problem appeared, he found a solution in a snap. Time flexibility is another plus, which was quite important for me. Not to mention the use of modern technology, once again. I definitely recommend and thank you again.

I have been cooperating with Mr. Hlavnička for a long time and what we agreed on always applied. He understands his work and the quality of his output is at the required level.

Maximum satisfaction. Willingness and reliability ... I can only recommend.

Good day, Despite the relatively higher price offered, we chose Mr. Hlavnička for the overall and relatively complex reconstruction of the family house, because at first glance we liked his approach and the skills presented. After the agreement, however, Mr. Hlavnička was very difficult to access and did not meet any deadlines, which we were forced to gradually postpone. Although we initially set the exact limit of our financial possibilities and Mr. Hlavnička assured us that we would fit within the limit, the budget received twice exceeded the originally agreed budget. Mr. Hlavnička's reaction was that if we get the material for free, we will reduce costs, and that we should not buy a Ferrari if we only have a Škoda (it is not possible to believe in retrospect that he is covering up his amateurish mistake with an offensive attack on a client). Mr. Hlavnička also falsified the confirmation from the data box to think that everything went according to agreement (a very successful Photoshop, which was received by the mayor, to whom the message was sent by data box, while under the weight of evidence Mr. Hlavnička finally admitted). Unfortunately, Mr. Hlavnička also confirmed the confirmation of the delivery of documents to the Office, the elaboration of individual documents and more. As far as the technical processing is concerned, the project did not correspond to the assignment and the processing was tragic. At this stage, we had an official report prepared for the project, from which about 4 pages of shortcomings emerged, and I was told below the footnote that I quote "it is not even in the quality of a year's work in high school". Unfortunately, any reaction of Mr. Hlavnička to the technical comments was "I've been doing this for 10 years and I've always been through it." Mr. Hlavnička's goal was to push the project through the building authority at all costs, and he reacted negatively to any of our comments and requests for repairs to the PD and did not intend to put his mistakes in order. He also made a mistake when applying for spatial planning, and therefore it was rejected for the first time. At the same time, he provided false information and intentions in his applications, about which he did not even inform us. After a personal verification at the building office, where I was warned of major deficiencies in PD, I lost my temper, and although Mr. Hlavnička wanted to push the project forward, we revoked the power of attorney I had given him. Despite this fact, Mr. Hlavnička continued to act legally within the already revoked power of attorney and, without informing me or asking for permission, contacted senior officials of the building authority and tried to appeal against a negative opinion issued by the authority - again completely incomprehensible. I would also like to add that he only looked at the building once, when it was purely a matter of getting to know us and the initial inspection of the house. He came for the second time only for money, however, the construction did not interest him during this visit. There were a lot of issues and lies on the head, and at the moment we are already laughing at the whole situation and we are glad that another and capable designer has taken over our project. Although Mr. Hlavnička is not an authorized engineer (this may explain a lot), we file complaints against him with the ČKAIT chamber, because such people only disgrace the field. Upon request, I am willing to provide a complete list of problems and advise on what to look out for, saving you a lot of time and money. Because it all seemed satirical, we are preparing an extensive chapter on this topic in our construction blog, so the link will be added. Have a nice day and successfully completed projects Vladislav