Secondary School of Civil Engineering, Hradec Králové

Graduated in 2015 The only building in the region at first glance seems like a good choice. In the end it is probably the best public school in HK, but ... These will be my personal impressions, which are only intended to bring the situation closer to future students. I do not intend to pointlessly defame or overplay the name of the school. I graduated in civil engineering. Of the upcoming 30 students in the class, 25 passed us to the school-leaving exam and all passed successfully. Teaching takes place in a decent environment, the headmistress really tries to make the study more pleasant and easier every year. The quality of teachers is very individual. It can be said that it is about luck, because whether or not you will master the subject, it certainly depends on the teacher at least 50%. Overall, I evaluate that the quality part of the teaching staff outweighs the less capable. However, the student is quite dependent on self-study. Not in terms of success at school, but in terms of its future after it. The content of the curriculum is generally unhealthy, the textbooks are useless and the resulting acquisition of experience for the next level of education is insufficient. At the same time a lack of practical information about universities. For example, you can get to CTU without an average of 2.0 in maths from the summary scoreboard until I was late. Overall, mathematics is a problem, as evidenced by the poor percentage success rate of passing the first year at technical universities just through MAT. That is, for students who did not disagree with the building industry during their studies and tried to continue. Furthermore, we have practice and a lot of other items that will hardly give you any insight. Personally, my classmates and I took most of my stuff only when we created a year-end project at the end of my studies. The level of language teaching (Czech, English, etc.) is good for a technical school, but it is not enough to continue in this direction, but this is not a school specialization, so it only has a note. My advice for future students to whom this review is given is: Learn to count, don't miss out on the beginnings of drawing, and if you think of the future, sometimes sit down on the Internet and enter terms from the curriculum. Pictures and videos will help you very much. Pay attention to the study of MAT, STA, MOT and drawing. Then it will be easy for you for 4 years and with a little effort you may be something. If you are not on lyceum, do not expect more than 3 excursions per year and do not expect any trips except for the ski boot. Although they are on the building, but we got max residuals after eLku or photos from the event on the bulletin boards. Finally, a few words on the background. I have already mentioned that the management is trying, in the end the equipment is sufficient, computer classrooms for drawing are the best at school, new windows and painted to please. Canteen can satisfy. But the bathroom is terrible and you should go to the bathroom at home. The result is 3 stars. I wish you many learning successes.

An absolutely excellent institution that kicked me in my path to becoming the best architect in history.

Satisfaction on all sides. My baby is happy there ...

absolutely shocking school, if you are considering enrolling in this school, you would rather choose the path of less resistance, if you are not afraid, and you are able to accept mental and even physical bullying from several teachers who do not want to name for tactical reasons, then this school is directly for your!!! There are exceptions such as Mr. Mensik, who is very helpful and kind, if you would like someone do not hesitate to contact me, I have shots where teachers drink directly in school, thrashing some kind of fallen or how they even help destroy school property !!! absolute anarchy reigns in school