Střední průmyslová škola sdělovací techniky

5 years after graduation on technical lyceum. The gentleman taught me to work, even though I am (and always will be) lazy (Professor Mizerovský :)) Panská taught me to think logically (Professor Malát, Professor Matějková) Mrs. taught me to be human (Professor Kyzeková) Mrs. taught me English well (Professor Boháčová) Mrs. taught me that even school can be fun (Professor Janků) Mrs. taught me to look at others with respect and not with my nose up (many of my great classmates and professors) The master taught me that even professors are people like everyone else (Professor Aron, Professor Zhouf) Mrs helped me achieve that today I have a job that I enjoy and feed and do not have to be ashamed of myself.

I was only here for the Matematika + graduation exam and I have to appreciate the good administration of the exam, everything prepared.

School with a good name and quality facilities. The advantage is the location in the center of Prague and not on the periphery. The school has its own cinema, gym, TV studio with keying area.

School with average equipment and an amazing team of students and teachers. This year I finished my lyceum and my satisfaction is at maximum level. When I chose the school, the main criterion was "normal" classmates and this was fulfilled to 300%. Now I am aiming at CTU FEE so far I can only say that I put the receiver at ease :)

(Nearly) Eight years after graduation - what to say, sometimes it was nice, sometimes fart and both the team and objects (mainly mathematics and technical drawing). And to tell the truth, I didn't get much of my practical life from studying ... perhaps just to sit in the cinema to enjoy the best sound and learn to write all ten. And to put it right, I decided not to continue in film and television practice after graduating from SPŠST Panská and chose a different career.

I do not know how today, but some 50 years ago SPŠST in Panská was a recognized and reputable school. I graduated here in 1968, so I greet all my classmates still alive!

Why is Panská the worst choice? First of all, because it's all a lie. I applied to the film industry because I found a passion in movies. And I cared about developing that passion. On the open day, everything looked fantastic. They show you around school, show you a film crane and other film equipment. They will take you to a editing room, a photography studio and talk about how artistically focused your field is. Admissions indicate that it is a dream school and will give you space to use your talent. You don't have to take tests in math, physics or geometry. You just have to take 9 photos, prepare analyzes of the film and answer in a general test who shot the Titanic. The impression is that the film is the only thing that matters. I am accepted and during the first month my illusions about the school of dreams dissolve. The only thing that counts is math, physics and geometry. All the subjects that seemingly had something to do with the film have a common name. I will give examples. Studio equipment: Physics and electrical engineering. If you imagine working in a studio with some film technology. You will be disappointed. Most of the time you listen to a monotonous explanation of resistors and electricity resistance calculations. Film and television production: writing for all ten and economics. Seriously, half of the time you sit at a computer and practice writing all ten, and the other half you fill out a tax return. Forget the connection with the production of the first year and a half of the subject. Aesthetics of sound: music. Aesthetics of sound - is indeed a noble name, but you do nothing with microphones, you learn notes and sing. I am not saying that the subjects taught under these names are bad or useless. They just don't have much in common with what they should represent, or Film. And in my opinion, they greatly deceive the candidates, who are then more than disappointed. Cantors: I think that the teaching profession is extremely important and insufficiently valued in our society. On the other hand, a minority of teachers can be described as good. I didn't like that the math teacher poured out his frustration on the student or the whole class because he didn't understand the material. The fact that the geometry teacher tells my mother that she will let me fail because I have poor performances and I'm not trying (the fact that I am a dysgraphist and dyslexic and I have problems with graphic expression, took into account two extra minutes for the test). I was at that school for 2 years and 3 months. I had about 5 mental breakdowns caused by stress at school. Towards the end, I suffered from depression with the initial stages of burnout. I reached a stage where staying was not an option. I hated every brick in the building. My departure was the best thing I could ever do.

Studying at a technical high school was an interesting adventure. Diligent filmmakers with cameras in their hands are running all around you. The teachers love you if you love them and the school is nice. I recommend. I would go again, but I can't.