Střední škola Brno, Charbulova, příspěvková organizace

Beautiful years, great teachers

Lady Poverty's horror des rage. Hunting hotel. Terrible tragedy !!!!!

Unprofessional behavior on the part of masters. Not interested in whether the student is sick in any way to be taken into account. Masters advise their problems on students. I'm glad I'm gone. At a better school.

Very annoying doorman, she was very annoying

Access to students is blatantly inadequate. Ignorance and arrogance in one. I hope I'm finally leaving. This is a nightmare.

The approach of some teachers and masters is appalling, arrogant and pseudo-authoritative behavior and rudeness. I'd rather not talk about student staff. : D Just an apprentice - the elite of society. There are also exceptions, more in graduation fields.

Although there is a lot of talk about this school, I would definitely not rank it among the worst. (As a student of Tourism, which falls under the section Gastronomy, my experience is limited to certain sections of the school, teachers, subjects and is also limited by the time I spent at this school.) - School equipment - As it is the largest secondary school in our country, it is necessary to take into account the scale at which gradual modernizations take place. Let's take the main building of the school (Charbulova 106), the building has been in existence for a few years, and its main skeleton is practically intact. The main difference will be its newer facade, newly installed cabinets, or the gradual installation of new lighting. As for electronics, there are several copiers, vending machines, computer classrooms on each floor, but some classes still do not have projectors or interactive whiteboards. The classes themselves do not look attractive, old linoleum, benches, chairs, blackboards, ... According to my sources, the school is planning large projects, such as the addition of a new building or the reconstruction of a sports field, which could be a reason for the seemingly intact state of the classrooms. - Reputation and access to students - The school is still mistakenly perceived only as an apprenticeship, which unfortunately reduces its prestige in the eyes of many parents, but also students who are interested in studying graduation. From my point of view, the difficulty of the high school diplomas here is comparable to the difficulty of the high school diplomas at any other school. Teachers' approach to graduate students is markedly different. We are expected to achieve better study results, behavior, attendance, ... as in the graduation fields at every other school. Only then is Tourism taken here as "the best that our school has to offer", which is often reminded to students in this field, and it creates a form of pressure. The teachers themselves are, in my opinion, mostly very willing people at school who value decent behavior, interest in studies and efforts. They try to educate students, they are fair and they treat students like adults. The quality of teaching depends a lot on the teacher, the able ones are predominant, but there are also a few teachers who, for various reasons, do not manage to teach the subject effectively. I encountered this problem with teachers of Mathematics, English and Tourism. However, I would like to mention teachers who, in my opinion, do honor to their profession: Mgr. Mikesova, Mgr. Kucera, Mgr. Lickova, Ing. Kubickova, Mgr. Hajkova, Ing. Pecka, M.Sc. Švandová and Mgr. Pravcová. - Students - During my entire studies, I had no problem with any of the students. (But I would mention here again that I do not come into contact with students of all disciplines on a daily basis, and I cannot say exactly how this happens in other classes or sections.) Certain fields are "more energetic" and so need to be regulated from time to time, but we talk mainly about offenses such as not wearing slippers, open windows during a break, noise during a break, slight disagreements between classmates, or running down the hall.