ZŠ U Roháčových kasáren

Výborná ředitelka

Good

They have a nice playground

The school as a place looks quite good and the interior of the building is. Leaving aside the garbage and forgotten snacks on the benches, it would be quite a tidy place where everyone will feel good. Classroom and school equipment is relatively good, if we do not count the computer room, where computers literally explode during SCIO tests. I appreciate the school library, where you won't find many books on the curriculum, but for example it is ideal for compulsory reading. The school playground is also quite well equipped, only more could be used. The school group, which is accessible to first graders, is equipped slightly below average, but this may have changed since my last visit. The chapter itself is teachers. I do not understand the exchange of class teachers every two years, especially in the first grade, where children in particular are fixated on their teachers. In addition, logically, in the first stage, one teacher has all the subjects, which, however, loses its meaning when changing teachers. When a child replaces two or three teachers in the first grade, it is not in his favor. It is no longer possible to talk about the frequent change of teachers in the second grade, because there the teachers change like socks, I will not even comment on non-compliance with school rules. The quality of teachers is not the same, but most can explain the basics to you. I have to appreciate Mrs. Mathematician, who can put the material into you and prepare for the admission procedure at the secondary school, whether we are talking about multi-year grammar schools or classical industrial schools. Czech language teachers are an extreme in itself. They cannot explain the substance, and when you ask a supplementary question, they do not want to explain the substance. The quality of English language teaching at this school is insufficient, in short, a total tragedy. This can also be said about teaching other foreign languages. I would evaluate natural history and geography very positively. I really appreciate a good explanation of the curriculum and approach to students. I would say about history that it won't sink you at this school, but it won't interest you in any way, unless you want a lot. But here it depends a lot on the teacher, because there are different existences in this subject. Physical education teachers try to arrange a frequent opportunity to represent the school in inter-school activities, which I would evaluate positively. Other educations are taken in a fun way, so you can't say you're bored in class. We must appreciate the newly renovated kitchen, which is very well equipped. I see the biggest problem in teaching physics, more precisely with one unspecified teacher. I can't evaluate the teacher's teaching, which I haven't experienced. In this case, everything is probably wrong. Let's start with the positive, by preparing for teaching, which was quite good. It's even worse with a teaching style that looks like the days of comrades. He cannot explain the substance sufficiently. If you do not understand the substance, he will tell you the same thing, with the impression that you will understand the substance a second time. If you tell him that you still don't understand the substance, he will be annoyed with you for no reason and threaten to test or test in front of the blackboard. He often asks you nonsensical questions during the exam, both orally and in writing. Several times in half a year you will receive a written paper in A2 or A3 format, often on the same topic. The most absurd is the adherence to certain submissive students, I will give an example immediately. For example, in the first half of the ninth grade, he threatened a student who had been trying for a whole year to make a clear average two degrees worse, not just one class member. But what bothered me most was his "great" laboratory work, which always mysteriously came out to visit the headmistress, who visited the lesson after several complaints about the second-grade teacher. Failure to follow school rules is just the icing on the cake. For example, in the Rules for the Evaluation of Article 2, paragraph 5, which allows a pupil to apologize for examinations in one hour of the semester, he was not complied with even once, because he agreed with the pupils on an "inter-order" agreement that all tests would be announced in advance. This was repeatedly violated, but the students still could not use their "dot".

Let's look at the paragraph below, ie. paragraph 6 of Article 2, which states that pupils may be examined orally only in the presence of their classmates. This rule was violated several times, when this part of the school rules was not observed, especially when examining pupils for the final grade on the report card. I could go on, but I think that is enough as an example. School management, although trying, could be much better. I appreciate at least partial communication with the pupils in the form of the pupil's parliament, which did not work despite the good idea. For a long time there was a demand for locks on the toilets, which in the end are only on the first floor, where they somehow lack meaning. A small child is not depraved enough to make the exercise open the door. Although this proposal was handed over to the school management several times, it never took place. There was also a demand for benches in front of the school, where pupils regularly wait, either for the school to open in the morning or before class. In the two years since the proposal was made, there is only one bench in front of the school, for a relatively large number of pupils. For this we have to appreciate "projects" for various anniversaries and important events. Let everyone make an opinion of this school themselves.

Excellent teachers at the 2nd level. No communication with the school. Very nice project days. Great praise for the project of the 100th anniversary of our republic. foreign languages ​​and deepening IT knowledge and skills.