Hledambyt.cz (C.D.A. Reality)

Quick and professional negotiations from the beginning to the signing of the contract. Mr. Suchomel was very nice and willing to help. I can only recommend :-)

After experience with this real estate I can not recommend it. Just to arrange a tour of the apartment (for rent) you have to go personally to the office, sign a declaration that you will not move into the apartment without knowing the realtor, and to pay a refundable deposit of 500 crowns to make it clear . During the meeting with the owner everything went well, we looked at the apartment and agreed to make a deposit on the reservation the day after, again in the office in Zizkov (but this could be done on the spot). After paying the reservation deposit, I received a so-called "draft lease agreement" - just a form without filled in information, ie nothing specific. There was also a lack of an accurate description of the apartment, the amount of rent and related fees, which makes the contract a contract. When I mentioned that the apartment was cooperative and that we should have a sublease contract, I was apologically delivered with a similar, actually the same pattern, differing only by adding a prefix to all words beginning with "rent" or "rent" "under". Which, in my opinion, is not an appropriate method of drafting a sublease contract. In addition to the unsafe terms used as "sublease", there were also some irrelevant articles, such as the right to a substitute lease, which is no longer legally guaranteed for sublease. Everything turned out so that after three days from the realtor told me that the owner is in serious condition in the hospital and that it will be dealt with his sister, after another two days they told me that the nurse left the apartment to a friend. So the whole event was gone and I had to go to Žižkov for the third time, this time to get my money from the advance. The icing on the cake is an incident where my roommate met yesterday the owner in the pub (with beer, of course), about a week after his alleged hospitalization. For this I received justification from another broker who described it as a common practice real estate - to say that the owner gave the apartment to someone else, and give it to the candidate who paid earlier. I am not saying that this was the case in our case, but I find it impossible.

I have a rather negative experience. Only what I proactively arranged went well. As soon as she came to the activity on the part of the broker, especially regarding the communication of my comments on the text of the contract to the owner, she did not react for a week. Then she did not respond by the agreed date, she apologized only after my urgency with the excuse that she has the power (directly exemplary customer care) and that the apartment owner fell ill (according to a review below, probably a popular tactic of the realtor). In the meantime, she discouraged me several times from insisting on incorporating comments, because the owner insists on it and the train doesn't go through it, but that everything according to NOZ. There were such pearls as: "The tenant wants to keep small animals in the apartment in question (eg: a little rabbit in a cage) and the landlord agrees", even though I do not keep any rabbits and I have never questioned him. The rabbit was probably kept there, judging by the litter swept behind the cupboard, by the previous tenant. In addition, the contract referred to non-existent points, and some points contradicted each other (commercial contract rental vs. business ban), as if someone had created it according to several patterns downloaded from the Internet and had not read it properly. The communication between the real estate agency and the owner of the apartment will probably be very bad, even though it is allegedly a long-term client of the real estate agent. The apartment was advertised for rent during October. When I showed interest in moving in this month, the owner was obviously surprised by this information.