TERMOBAU Ladislav Nejedlý s.r.o. - Janáčkova 301

I dealt directly with Mr. Nejedlý, who was recommended to us as an expert in the assessment of constructions and also as a technical supervisor of the construction. As SVJ, we hired him for these two services (preparation of a construction report in terms of defects and unfinished work and TDS). The apartment building, in which we bought apartments in 2018, is undergoing reconstruction, which has been accompanied from the very beginning by the very sad approach of the developer and also the original construction company. The building was to be completed in mid-2018, it must be added that we are still waiting for approval. At first, Mr Nejedlý seemed very solvent. Over time, however, it turned out that although he is familiar with the issue of construction and can talk about it extensively, which he also gets paid properly, but he is not a professional in several areas. He was unable to determine in advance at least an approximate price for his services. The object was inspected, however, the resulting report did not contain a number of defects and unfinished work, it had to be repeatedly pointed out of factual errors and inaccurate terminology, and to supplement a number of deficiencies. Although the final report contained a text description, photo documentation and an approximate budget for the elimination of defects and unfinished work (repeatedly requested), its overall appearance corresponds to a rather outdated form. The price for the report is less than CZK 25,000. However, we obtained at least some document that helped us have at least some argument for dialogue with the developer and the approximate cost of the completion, which we decided to co-finance with the other owners, although we would not have to. We therefore decided to hire him as a TDS. However, Mr. Nejedlý repeatedly failed to fulfill the obligations agreed in the contract. The situation was complicated by the declared state of emergency, however, the stumbling block was that Mr. Nejedlý sided with the developer and the completion of the construction began to postpone again. The records created from the two control days again contained factual errors and inaccuracies. Following a request for termination of cooperation in the form of an agreement, he appealed to SVJ's resolution, which was adopted as TDS, but during his tenure he did not comply with the content of another resolution, which clearly set out SVJ's action against the developer. In the meantime, another member of the community took over the negotiations with Mr. Nejedlý, but he also had the same experience (constant repetition of facts and an appeal to follow the agreed procedures). I held a meeting where he could present his views to all owners. He did not participate in that. Instead, he sent out an "opponent's report" to all apartment owners this time except me (the chairman of SVJ), in which he again took an insulting attitude towards me and the factual argument was completely missing. However, he charged it to the recapitulation of "hours worked". :-) This is called engineering activity ... TDS did not invoice for its activities continuously once a month, as agreed and as it was repeatedly requested, but only after the termination of the contract. In the final recapitulation, he also charged hours of e-mail communication with SVJ (constant questioning of the ordering party's instructions, offensive e-mails addressed this time only to me, to which I did not respond and asked him to stick to our contractual obligation), hours of negotiations with developer without SVJ representatives ...). In addition, he issued the invoice as an advance. He did not accept the claim for the invoiced amount. And when he finally converted the invoice into a tax document, he was paid less than CZK 10,000. Mr. Nejedlý's company also performs energy assessment of buildings. At the very beginning, we planned to work with him on this as well. As you can see, we will turn to someone else. I hesitated for a long time if I would write this review at all, and it is possible that Mr. Nejedlý's approach may suit someone. However, I believe that he has not been able to overcome several personal problems (perhaps because I am a woman, which was evident from his dealings with another member of the community who helped me when we fell ill), but in my opinion it does not belong to the business relationship at all. Most importantly: we wanted "only" a professional approach. We now have another TDS with which we are extremely satisfied. Despite all the insults addressed only on his part, I sincerely wish Mr. Nejedlé good health and enjoy his pension. Veronika Kolesárová

Dear Sirs, I am the owner of a company that has been wrongly criticized by the President of the Unit Owners Association. The Chairwoman, Veronika Kolesárová, concluded an Order Agreement with our company for the performance of the construction supervision function, in which the rights and obligations in the performance of construction supervision were stated. Before the start of construction supervision, the coronavirus began to spread in our country and thus personal contact between Ms. Kolesárová and our company was limited. Due to the fact that Mrs. Kolesárová was still ill for a few weeks, the communication was carried out only electronically, by e-mail. During the limited personal communication, she began to enter into the activities of construction supervision with very inappropriate decisions, which created a spark between us and usurped the right to decide on matters that were in the competence of construction supervision. Subsequently, she began to establish construction supervision as the owner of a company with subordination of my person. Since I have been working in construction for over 40 years and I have never had a negative response to my work, not only in construction supervision but in the implementation of constructions. Maybe Mrs. Kolesárová has some mental problems and this first criticism from a sick person (investment editor such as Slonková). Ms. Kolesárová, with her article published on this server, is not aware that it damages the company's reputation and that its actions with false information violates the law on protection personal data and defamation. I have over twenty e-mails from our mutual communication, in which it is clear that she was constantly losing against me, whether it was a breach of my Order Agreement and also misleading other owners of the community of units. I have many supporters among the owners of flats, and it is clear from this that Mrs. Kolesárová acted as an offended vanity on her own with the above-mentioned slanderous commentary. Bc.Ladislav Nejedlý - company executive