Raiffeisenbank, Inc.

Not cheap, but a good bank, with a pretty good reputation.

Maximum satisfaction. I didn't have to wait at all, immediately upon arrival I was received by a charming, kind and very helpful young banker. She made a deep impression on me, as did her kind and helpful colleague. I am glad that I chose this bank and especially this branch. For me, hat down and thumbs up.

The bank is great, everything works fine, I want to Praise the mobile application with which I am satisfied. But at this branch, I experienced the worst service from a young man who probably didn't even want the clients of this bank to bother him. Thank you I hope to improve your bank's serviced clients.

A review that describes everything and the sentence of the banker "And what would you like for 89 CZK", also: Today I arrived at the branch, because I needed to find out information about the insurance service PERSONAL GUARD FOR 89, -, which I arranged purely by chance about 2 months ago at the same branch (Terms of the agreed insurance were not printed, the client has to find everything himself on the bank's website). So beware, this bodyguard, which, as the name implies, is to be your bodyguard in the event of the loss of personal property, keys, theft of telephone, luggage and a long list of other things that a person can lose or be stolen, quite such a bodyguard is not. However, in a bank that has the "bank that is inspired by you" logo, it is inspired by the number of agreed additional services (and the profit for them). This service is useless. Why? After all, 89, - is nothing, it would seem (if we add a few thousand people who pay for it, we have a completely different amount). Well, because when they offer you the given service, they do not mention an important thing - the insurance is valid only IN THE EVENT OF FORCED FORCE TAKING OR FORCE VIOLENT THREAT. A sentence that takes bankers 5 seconds and lures the client's life. Why? Well, because he knows right away what the petty 89, -, pays for, and that the situation of forcible removal is less than theft in other circumstances, and it is better to get another insurance from another company, which will cover everything for you. It is clear from the situation that the mistake is on the part of the client, who simply trusted the bank and did not read the conditions himself. I mention this in order to make clear the bank's approach to clients, which is oriented not to their satisfaction. If the Client is dissatisfied with the service, he may at least be satisfied with the banker's approach in the matter. Unfortunately not in this case. The banker decided to put the icing on the cake "And what would you like to have for 89 CZK?"